Back
Earnings Call Transcripts

Rockwell Automation, Inc.

ROK
Quarters2 Quarters
ContentQ&A Sections
SourceEarnings Conference Call
Quarter 1

Q3 2026 Earnings Call — August 4, 2026

Management: Thanks, Blake. We'd like to get to as many of you as possible, so please limit yourself to one question and a quick follow-up. Julianne, let's take our first question.

Analyst Scott Davis (Milius Research): Thank you. Numbers look pretty solid overall. I got a little confused on the price comments. Maybe, Christian, you can help out a little bit. It seems like you guys have been running at about a one point of price positive. Now you're talking about getting, I think, another one and then another one and a half on top of that for tariffs. Maybe I didn't hear that right. Just walk us through that, just A, to check my math, and B, is this an 80-20 initiative that you're able to drive some incremental price? Are the tariff price increases actually separate and they come off as soon as tariffs come off? Kind of how mechanically do you guys manage this?

Executive Christian: Yeah, sure, Scott. I appreciate the question. So we typically give a view on price for the full year at the outset of our guide for the beginning of the year. And then we kind of give updates as we go through. So we've always been calling out about 250 bps, 200 to 250 bps of price for the full year 2026. 100 bps of that is coming from tariff-based price. 150 bps is coming from underlying price. In the third quarter, we started to lap some of the comps on tariff-based price. So the tariff-based price side was 1%. And underlying price was close to nil. A lot of that has more to do with the timing of when our price increases have gone through. So we did an inflationary-based price change that happened in Q3. We're going to see that come through in the fourth quarter. That all is consistent with what we were expecting for the full year, that 250 basis points of total price. That tariff-based price, just to make sure we're on the same page around that, I know we talked about this message before, but tariff-based pricing is really there to create EPS neutrality around tariff-based costs. and so that's the, it's not really all that incremental as far as the conversion goes. So just wanted to note that for you.

Analyst Scott Davis (Milius Research): Yeah, no, that clears it up. And just quickly on Plex, I haven't heard you mention Plex in a while. Where are we on the deal model on that asset and how are you guys feeling about it?

Executive Christian: Yeah, feeling good about Plex. Plex was part of the software ARR that was at the higher end, high single digits. Plex continues to add new logos, automotive tier suppliers, consumer, which at the very beginning, that was one of the fundamental hypotheses is that we could use our existing market access to help Plex expand into consumer packaged goods, and that's exactly what we've done. Very profitable, new functionality, the embedding of the Gentic AI throughout in various of the modules work and this is especially exciting to me personally work to integrate Plex and you know the traditional MES with fleet management from our mobility from mobile robots and so you hear a lot going on about orchestration and we've got a great head start by having a really fantastic cloud native MES system with Fleet Management. So again, Plex is part of the software ARR that was up high single digits in the quarter. Good update. Thank you, guys. Best of luck.

Management: Thanks, Scott.

Analyst Andrew Obin (Bank of America): Yes, good morning. Just maybe a broader, bigger picture question on inflation and pricing. As you look over the next six to 12 months, what's going to get better, right? Because labor costs probably not going down. I think the semiconductor supply chain is not going to get better. I think raw materials remain in flux. And how do you adapt to this environment? So maybe your thoughts on inflation and what sort of structural countermeasures can you do, because it seems like you guys are going to be in this inflationary growth environment for a while.

Executive Christian: Yeah, Andrew, it's a good question. And for sure, inflation is a dynamic environment right now. You know, it started with memory earlier this fiscal year for us, and it's continued to expand. Data center is definitely, and data center demand is impacting a number of things, memory being the biggest one, but there's a number of other aspects that are coming with it. So, first of all, from a number one issue is let's make sure we can ship product. So that means let's make sure we have the components and we have good availability. The supply chain team has been on this all year long. So they have done a really good job of putting us in a good spot to be able to continue to produce our product. And so that is not impacted. Now, that being said, the cost side, the cost side is, again, it's the inflation continues to be an item that is a growing headwind for us. ==First quarter call, I talked about it being a single digit millions kind of headwind. Second quarter call, it was a double digit million headwind.

This call, I'll tell you that it's still double digit million headwind for the second half here that we're experiencing.== And it's a higher number than what we had last quarter. So it is, in fact, increasing. Now, all that being said, we are in a position that we can go and get price to offset that. We have a lot of productivity actions that continue to occur inside the organization. and there's a lot of other aspects that can continue to work in our favor. Probably the biggest one is that we are in a growing volume environment, which does provide us the opportunity to go back and recapture some of the areas that we think we have savings on direct material, negotiation with suppliers, not necessarily on the ones that are impacted by inflation so much, but we do have an opportunity to continue to work really hard on the direct material cost. So the team is doing a good job with that. As we turn the page and we start thinking about next year, it's tough to know exactly what we're going to expect with regard to inflation because, again, it's not one of those that we're expecting to stabilize anytime soon.

But we will continue to react to it, try to get ahead of it with regard to the supply chain and making sure we have the product in place, and we'll take pricing actions as appropriate. So, Christian, maybe just a few additional comments to that.

Executive Christian: Andrew, you asked structurally about what are we doing. Fortunately, we're actually able to take advantage of some of the structural changes that we incorporated during the supply chain shortages a few years back. A lot of that has to do with really good coordination with our channel partners because, you know, pricing for products largely goes through distribution. So moving to a fixed discount methodology for faster realization of price, more frequent price changes where we're in an environment like this, internally making progress on alternate sources of some material so that we can introduce some competition into the mix. Those things are helping us well in the current environment. Thank you.

Analyst Andrew Obin (Bank of America): And just maybe a question on lifecycle services. I would have thought that as you're starting to see a pickup in organic growth, the installation business would pick up. Is it really driven mostly by these large CapEx projects that are still on the come? What's missing on the services ARR? Thank you.

Executive Christian: Sure. Yeah, I think what we're seeing as we look at delays in the projects, we went deeper on that to look at the specific reasons given by customers. Overall, it's a cautious approach to deploying capital. It's a desire to delay things that are important but perhaps not urgent in their eyes. We're seeing high levels of decision authority for green lighting some of these projects. In certain cases, funding constraints. That was a specific issue with Capital Projects and LATAM that we saw. So, you know, there's nothing earth shattering terms and conditions. I've mentioned that before as people in such a volatile environment with respect to tariffs and inflation, they want to make sure that the cost side of their business case is solid. And in some cases, they're looking to take a card, so to speak, to be able to try to find a little more uncertainty, a little more certainty in these situations. So it's a number of things and some of the factors are similar for the CapEx projects as they are for the lower ARR in services. You know, some of the root cause goes back to which industries are deploying capital and which are staying put. Food and beverage is one that we've given as an example, which is a traditionally strong contributor to both lifecycle services CapEx projects as well as ARR with programs like cybersecurity. Thank you.

Management: Yep. Thanks, Andrew.

Analyst Andy Kaplowitz (Citigroup): Hey, good morning, everyone. Baker Christian, last quarter you mentioned that book to bill was a bit over your normal range. Was that still the case in Q3, Andrew, or would you say that you have more backlog covers than usual at this point going into Q4? And then it seems like you're seeing some more unlock of larger CapEx projects now in larger markets such as auto and life sciences. Why those markets? Maybe you could elaborate and then prove what you're seeing in those markets.

Executive Christian: Yeah, so on the book-to-bill question, we called it out last quarter because it was just slightly above our normal corridor. That number we called out was for the first half we were expecting it to be back inside the corridor. In fact, for the first half it was inside the corridor and then we were expecting for the remainder of the year it was going to be inside the corridor. Q3 was inside of that corridor. So generally we feel just fine about the development of our orders. It's consistent with what we're seeing on the sales side as well. So all in all, the book to bill is in good shape.

Executive Christian: Yeah. and Andy, regarding automotive and life sciences, I am proud and happy to report that we saw a strengthening, a renewed strengthening in those. Obviously, those are not related to data center spend, which is encouraging to see the broad-based nature of it. Automotive, we are seeing some green shoots of new projects. We've talked before about Automobile manufacturers previously taking a pause as they shifted back from the surge in electric vehicle spending to recognizing that customers are still buying hybrid as well as internal combustion engine propelled vehicles. And we've seen some good projects. I mentioned one from a large OEM. And we've seen some really important competitive wins in terms of standardizations on Rockwell's architecture that pretty exciting. And these are around the world as well. In life sciences, you know, we've talked about that as a multi-year trend. Obviously, there, you know, some specific marquee programs such as rollout of GLP-1 drugs, oral solid dose variants of GLP-1 is an important innovation that's driving a lot of need for additional automation. Our MES had some important competitive wins in drug substance.

So we've been used for a long time in other parts of life sciences manufacturing. We're seeing increasing competitive wins in drug substance, which is pretty exciting. So we like those wins and we think those are sustainable growth factors. I'll mention as well, we talk about 10% organic growth in the quarter. If you took everything out that was related to data center, our organic growth would still have been 8% in the quarter, and that's a good number. Very helpful, Blake.

Analyst Andy Kaplowitz (Citigroup): And then maybe just on sort of the overall data center ecosystem business, maybe the update us on the sort of trend to trade the sort of commercial controllers for industrial PLCs, like how much that's helping logics. And, you know, overall, like you've been very focused on the penetration into e-commerce. So maybe talk to us about, you know, obviously you raised the estimates for the end markets, but how much of this is Rockwell penetrating as the end markets continue to be strong?

Executive Christian: Yeah, I think you can look at, you know, additional share growth into data center applications on top of a continually strong growing fundamental in terms of overall data center opportunities. To recap, three main areas of data center participation for Rockwell. There's the power distribution through our modular cubic design. This was the acquisition of the Danish company we made a few years ago. There is our participation with the chiller manufacturers in terms of power controls. So think motor control centers, big drives, medium voltage drives with the chiller OEMs. And then there's the work that Logix is being increasingly used for, primarily in the central utility plant. And so this is, you know, control of energy monitoring. It's emergency power backup generator controls. Logix has inherent redundancy and safety characteristics that you can't get in the traditional distributed digital controller DDC units. And so we're seeing increasing standardization on those units by the hyperscalers as well as the contractors as they're trying to put together modular, very repeatable designs that increase the speed to capacity. Appreciate all the color, guys.

Analyst Chris Snyder (Morgan Stanley): Thank you. So I was following up on some of the commentary earlier that larger scale capital projects remain sluggish. Even despite that, the company has been able to generate very strong growth this year, almost 10% and healthy orders with the strength obviously being driven by the short cycle side, whether it's investments in efficiency or brownfield. So I guess the question is, is when you look at how the orders have developed or customer conversations into 27, how do you see these two respective sides of the business tracking? Do you think the short cycle can sustain the momentum we're seeing? Do you think there's reasons to believe that the large project business can show positive rate of change? Any color on that would be helpful. Thank you.

Executive Christian: Sure. Let me give some just general comments about trends as we look at fiscal year 27. Look, tailwinds broadening of the growing verticals that we've been talking about. We don't see a reason that those are going to slow, which includes many that you're talking about. But it's not just short cycle. Energy was up high single digits. So there is contribution from process, which is to say that I don't think you can label, you know, that we're at a specific point in the traditional cycle, you know, that traditionally you'd see short cycle, packaging, discrete, you know, followed by, you know, a couple of quarters by longer cycle process. I think, you know, the continued reverberations from COVID and supply chain shortages still have some impact. Data Center makes its own weather, so to speak, which has an impact with, requirements for power to support data center. So I think it's hard to pin a specific point in the cycle on where we are, but we're very happy to see the contribution across different verticals and discrete hybrid and process. We expect data center to keep on keeping on.

We are happy with the renewed investments in automotive and life sciences. Home and Personal Care within Consumer Packaged Goods was actually good in the quarter. Labor costs and shortages are going to continue to drive customer investment and automation as America continues to be interested in bringing more manufacturing on board. That only happens in a durable way with the thoughtful combination of a trained and engaged workforce with the kind of technology that we offer. New product introductions to continue to take share. We talked about that before. Productivity is going to be as important as ever. And you can bet that as we're going into the year, you know, it's going to be continued aggressive productivity that's driven a lot of our recent success. And we're going to keep doing that. Pricing actions. Christian talked a little bit about that. And we continue to look at ways to further tune our ability to maximize price. And these are going to be needed because as Christian talked about, inflation is not going to go away. We're going to continue to expect tariff volatility, hope for the best, but plan for continued volatility there.

And then geopolitical uncertainty is not likely to clear up soon. So that's kind of

Analyst Chris Snyder (Morgan Stanley): Thank you. I really appreciate that. And then maybe following up with a shorter term question on Q4. I think you said margins flat sequentially. and I was just wondering are there headwinds coming through that we should be aware of because typically you see the margins step up on the higher volume sequentially into Q4 and then this year it feels like in particular we're going from price cost negative in Q3 to positive in Q4 which I would think is just an incremental tailwind to that margin ramp. So just anything to call out as we kind of think about that Q3, Q4 margin progression. Thank you.

Executive Christian: Yeah, Chris, thanks for that. So yeah, the sequential side, it really, you know, we're talking about in that sequential low single digit up, it's all coming for the most part from the solutions project configured order side of the business that will have a negative impact from a mixed perspective. And then on top of that, the inflation is still coming. And so we're expecting that inflation is going to continue to be even sequentially a drag against us. And so yes, the volume is going to be there, but it's going to be offset somewhat by the mix and the inflation side. So that's why we're talking about the sequential enterprise operating margin being platish.

Analyst Jeff Sprague (Vertical Research Partners): Hey, thank you. Good morning. My question kind of rhymed a little bit with one you just answered, but I was wondering if we could just put a finer point on what the price cost headwind was in Q3 and specifically what you were expecting in Q4? And just trying to get a sense then, Christian, if you're taking this question, I assume you are like, how do we think about how you're jumping off into 2027 from a price cost basis based on that Q4 answer?

Executive Christian: Sure, Jeff, I do. The price-cost side, obviously, we're calling it out that it was a headwind for us in Q3. We do expect that that's going to be an area that should be positive for us in Q4, but it is against a rising inflation. So probably not going to dimensionalize exactly what the numbers were in the quarter. Just to let you know, though, that in Q3, just to give that as an example, when we break out that core growth that we had year over year, volume was the biggest driver. Mix was the second biggest driver. And there was just a small partial offset that happened from the price-cost negativity. So when we turn to the next quarter, again, we expect price-cost is going to be positive for us in the year-over-year. That's the important aspect. The sequential side, yes, we're expecting we're going to make some good progress with the price coming in, but the inflation is going to be higher still yet. And I guess that implies then volume in Q4 is not as robust as what we saw in Q3, if I'm interpreting that correctly.

Executive Christian: I think it's, you know, you got to think about it from the mix side that's happening there, too. So when you have sequentials that with software and control, we're calling out flat sequentially, there will be some price in there sequentially. So, you know, the volume is going to be a tick less. But at the same time, we're still talking software control being up teens year over year. and expansion of margins by nearly 200 basis points on the segment margin for software and control. And obviously, those are tough comps that we're talking about in the fourth quarter. That is our toughest comp of the year before.

Analyst Andrew Buscalia (BNP Paribas): Hey, good morning, everyone. I wanted to touch on, yeah, good morning. I wanted to touch on along those lines, that line of questioning, software control margins. You know, you've done a lot of good work this year. You know, you get those margins up even higher and organic growth has really picked up, but you're running into some pretty tough comps in 2027 and a really high bar for margins. I know you don't want to give 2027 guidance, but can you set us up for how you're thinking about Software and Control as we move into next year, just given the high bar we're looking at.

Executive Christian: Sure. I'll make a few general comments about its position in the market, and then Christian can add some additional detail to that. But, you know, we're only just now getting to and through the units of controllers shipped that we were at pre-COVID. So there was a lot of volatility over the last six or seven years. And so we're going to exceed the unit volume in logics controllers, which drives a lot of the software control performance this year. And so we're happy about that. But think about the underlying market growth, natural market growth that would have existed had it not been for these exogenous events that we get to. plus gaining market share in these areas. And we do think that we're gaining market share in controllers. So while we're very happy with the growth and the performance, which doesn't just happen passively, it happens by innovative new designs and managing costs and deploying investment to the areas that we, with our knowledge of the market, believe are going to yield the greatest growth. There's a lot of opportunity. We're not hitting anything close to an asymptote of where we're not going to be able to continue to grow and to perform from a profitability standpoint.

Executive Christian: And then specific around software control margins, yeah, it's been a great story. The last two years has generated a lot of expansion of software control margins. and that's been predominantly driven by the volume side. Price has certainly been a big help. As we start thinking about 2027 and the setup on it, yep, the memory cost and inflation is going to hit that business hardest. There are pricing actions that we have taken. We'll continue to evaluate that and as Blake had mentioned, we'll be dynamic around our response around that. The key though is that when we're talking about mid-30s almost, segment operating margins, initial outlook. But, you know, we're talking about low 30s for total segment operating margin for software and control for the full year 2026. I think we have the opportunity to continue to build off of that.

Analyst Andrew Buscalia (BNP Paribas): Okay. Yeah. And, you know, the other question I had was around kind of your two problem areas or weaker areas, automotive and food and beverage are big chunkier sales, but both are indicating higher growth this quarter. I'm wondering how much of that is easy comp or true demand picking up in either one of those markets?

Executive Christian: Yeah, I think you should look at that as a positive read on demand as well as our offering. So automotive in the teams is a good result. It's a good result last quarter as well. And we cited some renewed project activity there. I'm not ready to call that the floodgates are open, but we've seen some nice wins beyond modernizations in new projects. The things that drives the most spend in automotive through the cycle is model changes. And as people are re-centering on hybrid and industrial internal combustion vehicles, we've seen some great wins as some of the big brand owners have standardized on our designs outside of our traditional end customers. Food and beverages are single biggest vertical, and even without CapEx, we're seeing mid single digit growth. So that's not bad where there is another gear to be had, so to speak, if CapEx does pick up there. And we're doing that through our domain expertise, our offering. And so, you know, people are going to continue to want to eat. And so we think it's a good long-term market to have such a strong position in.

Management: Thanks, Blake.

Analyst Noah Kay (Oppenheimer): Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe we could sort of level set on where we're at in the production logistics growth strategy. We're sometime now into the auto integration. You've continued to launch more offerings for orchestration production logistics. It feels like some increased wallet share capture is driving some of the outgrowth that we're seeing. But we'd just sort of love an update on how you see the integration and what the growth prospects look like.

Executive Christian: Sure. I really like our position in so-called production logistics. In addition to the people who make their living moving parcels or packages around, production logistics as a part especially of consumer packaged goods is being seen by the customers as a really important and maybe previously overlooked area of additional productivity for them as they added a lot of fixed automation in the make line. You know, if you're making shampoo or packaging bread or what have you, but bringing the material, the packaging material, the components to the line and taking it away to the loading dock or into the warehouse, that's really where production logistics is focused in those areas. Independent Cart Technology plays a role in that. We're having a good year with Eye Track and Magna Motion. The automobile robots will see another year of strong double-digit growth. We continue to work on the profitability there, and we expect that will be profitable and clear path in the fourth quarter.

But in addition to the consumer, you also see opportunities for this in semiconductor, for instance, with wafer transport in operations that previously used forklifts to take material over long distances. You see it in life sciences, opportunities there. So we really think that we have the portfolio to be able to address this across multiple industries. And one of the things that's important is to make sure commercially we have the right coverage in these areas. And so we've spent some time looking at making sure that the customers who are most interested in this, you know, have good commercial coverage by us and our partners. So it's a good area. I think to your question, we're early in the growth opportunity in production logistics, and we continue to build it out.

Analyst Noah Kay (Oppenheimer): And then just to follow up question on CapEx trajectory, you know, we're coming in around 3% of sales for the year here, as you said in your remarks. I think, you know, talking in the past about this potentially stepping up to 4% in coming years, you talked about the $2 billion of investments that you're making. You know, can you maybe just give us a refresh on the trajectory there? Should we be gearing up for that sort of 4% that step up next year?

Executive Christian: Yeah, so we are expecting that next year we're going to be spending more CapEx than this year. But I do think we're still going to stay in that 4% or so. We do have Greenfield project. Obviously, it's happening in New Berlin, Wisconsin. We'll start making investments at pace as we turn and look at 27. That'll take us into 28 as well. Now, important, ROIC for us has actually has recovered nicely. So even with that higher investment level, we still feel like the trajectory is going to be good with ROIC. EBIT does continue to grow. So we're really liking the returns that we're getting right now on the legacy part of the organization, but also the investments that we're looking at for the future. We're feeling like they're going to have a really strong ROI that's going to continue to be accretive to the organization.

Management: Great. Thanks, Christian. Julianne, we'll take one more question.

Analyst Joe Ritchie (Goldman Sachs): Certainly. Our last question today will come from Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Analyst Joe Ritchie (Goldman Sachs): Hey, guys. Good morning. So just a lot is covered today. I just have one question just around the S&C margins in the fourth quarter. So I think if I'm doing the math right, you're essentially forecasting 4Q's S&C margins to be below 30%, so-called, somewhere in the high 20s. I'm just wondering, is it possible to help bridge that? And I know that you talked a little bit about price-cost, you talked a little bit about mix, but I'm just having a hard time bridging the sequential decline from 3Q to 4Q. Thank you.

Executive Christian: Hi, Joe. Good morning. No, we actually are. We're not looking at it to be in the 20s and in Q4. We're looking at to be in the low 30s. That number actually is going to be probably closer to, let's say, 33-ish, which is about what the average is going to be for the full year, I think, if I'm looking at the numbers correctly. So, yeah, and again, that sequential side is really more the inflation coming in. with the volume or the top line being flat. So that's really how the math comes together.

Management: Okay, perfect. Thanks for the clarification.

Management: Okay, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining us today.

At this time, you may disconnect.

Thank you.

Quarter 2

Q2 2026 Earnings Call — May 5, 2026

Analyst Scott Davis (Nelius Research): Hey, good morning, Blake and Christian and Ajana. Everything seemed pretty clear. But I guess this data center market, if it's doubling, must be getting to somewhat of a material size, I would think. I'm remembering it at kind of 1% of sales. If it's doubling, that means 2% of sales. You double from there, it's 4%. If you get my point, I'm just... Are you comfortable sizing it for us and helping us understand what that TAM may look like for your products?

Executive Blake (Title): Sure. Scott, we're real proud of the progress we're making in data centers. We've talked about it as being low single digits, so a modest amount of base revenue. And we don't change the percentage splits of the individual verticals that we show in the slides except annually. And so we'll take a look at that and see where it lands to determine whether there's more explicit dimensioning of the data center business. But just for review as well, you know, data center for us comes from, I'd say, three main places in our offering. The first would be the power distribution, largely through our cubic technology that we acquired a few years ago. The second would be the growing trend to replace commercial-grade controls with industrial PLCs, logics as a natural choice for its safety and reliability, participating with some of our large HVAC customers. So think about the chiller demand and so on in drives from those customers. So we're proud of the progress, and we'll take a look at the numbers at the end of the year.

Analyst Scott Davis (Nelius Research): Okay, helpful. And then, Blake, I think twice in the prepared remarks you mentioned kind of productivity and modernization projects being the emphasis versus kind of the larger scale stuff. But what does that mean as it relates to kind of content intensity and differences? I mean, how meaningful is that change for Rockwell?

Executive Blake (Title): Well, you know, I'd say the modernizations, the expansions of the existing brownfields, it's the same products that ultimately go into the solutions as when CapEx is being invested. There's probably a little bit heavier involvement in capital projects for lifecycle services. So that's part of what's, you know, muting the lifecycle services growth. But those modernizations, those expansions, you know, lots of logics, lots of intelligent devices, and so on in those projects.

Analyst Andy Kaplowitz (Citigroup): Hey, good morning, everyone. Blake, it seems like you raised your forecast for several CapEx-intensive end markets. Semicon Energy Chemicals, I think. Is it fair to say that you're seeing some decent unlock in larger projects versus less? Maybe you can give more color to the drivers and durability of the unlock. Obviously, it looks like short cycle's gotten a bit better. We all see the improvement in the USISM, but the customer decision-making on large projects just accelerate, and why do you think that is?

Executive Blake (Title): So it's in certain of the industries that we've been talking about where CapEx is being invested. We've talked about e-commerce and warehouse automation for a while now, data center. We added to that semiconductor and energy as well. And so we are seeing enough of a broadening in the capital being invested to make particular note of that. What I should mention, however, is that we're still not seeing a wholesale unlock of capital in some of our biggest end markets, namely automotive and consumer packaged goods, including food and beverage. We had good results in those verticals in the quarter, but in the case of consumer packaged goods in particular, it's more a factor of those modernizations that I mentioned, good performance with midsize customers where our channel particularly in North America, is so valuable. And then the impact of new offerings, some sizable projects with mobile robots and some of the newer additions to the Rockwell portfolio.

Analyst Andy Kaplowitz (Citigroup): Helpful, Blake. And then, Blake or Christian, obviously operating leverage is helping you, but when we look at your major segments, such as intelligent device and software control, you mentioned positive pricing and productivity is helping, and as you've said, you're now focused on averaging 50 percent incrementals in 26 versus 40 percent, I think, which was your original guide. So, I know you're focused on continuous improvement, but how much is that helping in impacting, for instance, price versus cost, and are we starting to think that core incrementals at Rockwell could be higher than your previous long-term algorithm?

Executive Blake (Title): Yeah, sure, Andy. Appreciate the question. The productivity cadence at Rockwell has been really good over the last couple of years and quite pleased with the progress of the team. And I think you're noticing something that's really great to see, which is it's not just the productivity programs overall in and of themselves, but it's actually a broadening of the thought process of the organization and continue to drive additional ways to win, additional ways to bring through that profitability. You know, as you know, we're getting some really nice growth on the volume side, and that's flowing through nicely. You mentioned about the incremental margins for 2026 coming in at around 50% in our guide, which is great. Historically, we talk about 35% flow through. I think, you know, when you think about a cycle and how the incrementals work through the cycle for us, we still feel very comfortable with that 35% that we've signed up for. As we move forward and we get to a point where we start talking about other targets for the organization, we do it under the overall umbrella of our growth algorithm. That would be the moment if we were to revisit it, that's what we would do. But again, 35% is a really good flow-through number for us to target for an industrial company. So we're happy with that.

Analyst Julian Mitchell (Barclays): Hi. Good morning. Just wanted to start with the enterprise operating margin guidance because I think it's pegged at about 22% in the second half of the year, and the quarter just delivered was 22.5%. It's very, very rare for margins in the back half to come down versus fiscal Q2, but that's what the guide is implying. Is this all just this sort of inflation from memory and so forth? Anything else in there? Maybe mix is assumed to reverse or something like that.

Executive Christian (Title): I think mix was a decent tailwind in the first half. Yeah, maybe I'll start with that one and Blake can jump in, but first of all, to confirm, historically we've talked about a total segment operating margin percentage target for medium term that's in the 23.5%. Now that we're talking about enterprise operating margin, you're right, the math is about 22% is what that target is, and we just did a number that's slightly above that. As we talk about and think about the second half of the year, and I said this in my prepared comments, we do have some inflationary pressures that are coming into play, specifically around memory, but also on raw commodities and other supplier inflation. So we also have some additional spending coming through in the second half. And I think it's just as important to note that Q2 was a really strong outperform. We had a number of things that converged all quite nicely for us. And, you know, that's everything from the volume increase that we had sequentially that, you know, the factories performed really well on that. The spending level was kept in check. We were able to get really good price realization in the quarter.

So it all converged quite nicely. And, you know, when you look at the incrementals we had from Q1 to Q2, that flowed through really well. So, you know, to be able to try to hold on to that and keep that, you know, that total enterprise operating margin flat sequentially from Q2 to Q3. And then again, when we think about the full year numbers, we will have a little bit of mixed shift that happens in the fourth quarter, which is normal for us. That will be somewhat detrimental to our margins sequentially from Q3 to Q4. So overall, I feel comfortable with how this rolled together.

Executive Blake (Title): Yeah, just the only other things to add to that are that mixed shift in the fourth quarter. That's the typical seasonal higher deliveries of lifecycle services and engineered lineups that we typically see in the fourth quarter. We're taking a prudent approach to this. The other comment that Christian made about cost is really associated with the accelerated pace of new product introduction that is really across all of our businesses, but especially in software and control and intelligent devices. We're going to see a lot of new products at automation fair this year and into next year.

Analyst Julian Mitchell (Barclays): That's helpful. Thank you. And then my second question just on the demand front I guess first off was there any kind of surge in orders in recent weeks there were some other kind of industrial companies or shorter cycle industrial companies who saw very very high orders growth in the March quarter, you know, multiples of their organic revenue growth. We just wondered on the extent of the orders increase that you've seen and any particular color on the logics platform within that, please.

Executive Christian (Title): Sure. Julian, we continue to look very carefully at the buying patterns at our distributors. We look at their inventory levels. And we continue to regularly survey our machine builders so that we make sure we understand and can ensure that the demand is natural. And that was the case in the quarter. We did not see any pull forwards or advance orders in the quarter. So we're encouraged by that. Logix itself grew over 20% in the quarter. We continue to see strong gains in logics. We're introducing new products. We're seeing conversions in data center. So that business is doing quite well with, you know, some very exciting additional introductions planned over the coming year.

Analyst Chris Snyder (Morgan Stanley): Thank you. I wanted to follow up on the demand commentary. I think if I heard correct that you said the book to bill was above the normal range, so if you could just confirm that and like just maybe confirm what the normal range is if I heard that correct and then just I guess more broadly have customer conversations changed you know it felt like over the last year the messaging was that there's a lot of interest in relocating production into the US but companies were just not pulling the trigger yet. Do you think that has flipped? And if so, why?

Executive Blake (Title): Sure. So, Chris, I'll start with some comments, and Christian might add to that. Look, we've talked about a normal corridor for book-to-bill orders over shipments as being between 0.95 and 1.1. In the quarter, it was a little bit above that for the first half. It was within that corridor, and we expect the full year to be within that corridor. So there was good demand, good conversion in the quarter of orders received, but we just saw orders particularly strong, especially in products in the quarter. From an overall customer demand standpoint, the sentiment is still positive. There's excitement, I would say, about the focus on manufacturing in America, you know, our home market. And while we have seen the uncertainty around tariffs and geopolitical and some inflation delay capital in a few of the markets I mentioned, like consumer packaged goods and automotive, in these other industries, including a couple that, you know, we started talking about this quarter that we haven't talked about in the past, capital is being spent. And so, I'd say the general mood is positive, but undeniably, there are, there's still some uncertainty and volatility in the areas that I mentioned.

Executive Christian (Title): Maybe just a quick follow-up on the book develop number that Blake mentioned. So that book to bill in that range they talked about, the 0.95 to 1.1, for us, that is the range for Q1 to Q3. Q4 for us, it's very common for us to have a book to bill that's below one. We don't call that out typically just because of the fact that, again, Q4 tends to be a higher shipment quarter for us. So we build up a little bit on the backlog during the course of the year, and Q4, it comes back down to a more normalized level. But again, can't overemphasize, just slightly above that corridor in the second quarter and for the first half inside that corridor.

Analyst Chris Snyder (Morgan Stanley): Thank you. I appreciate that. If I could follow up on margins, and I understand there's a lot of moving parts with inflation changing quickly and mix, but I wanted to ask about the structural self-help margin opportunity for the company. At the Investor Day, you guys talked about a lot of opportunity. Clearly, a lot of that has been realized if we look at the margin expansion over the last couple of years. And I guess you guys are running ahead of that 23.5% medium-term target already. So I guess, where are we in this self-help journey? When you guys look into 27 and 28, do you still see more opportunity on that front? Or from here, is it more about driving volumes to get the margins higher?

Executive Blake (Title): Yeah, thanks, Chris. For sure, we never shy away from volume. Volume is extremely important, and of course we want that. But from the productivity and the self-help side, I am, and we talked about this at Investor Day as well, I think we're quite happy with how things are progressing with your organization. The number of projects we have that are underpinning our productivity program, and that productivity program is alive and well. It did not conclude. We are, in fact, adding to it. We have more projects under that today than what we did a year ago and more projects a year ago than what we had two years ago. So we continue to build on that base. Yes, the projects probably have a little bit smaller overall number or average size, but we continue to execute against that. And importantly, you know, as I'm on the road and going out and visiting our facilities and going into our operations, it's really exciting to have the operations team. They want to show all the different productivity projects they're working on. They are being very creative. We're doing everything from starting to build our own automated final assembly stations.

There's insourcing projects that are happening. I heard a project last week around saving on labels that were costing us less than a penny already, and they were able to save a whole bunch of cost on that. We're streamlining our builds. Those are all great, and that's exactly what the operations should be doing in a continuous improvement environment. But it's beyond that also, the selling organization, the marketing team, the overall office staff inside the corporate office. Yes, AI is enabling a portion of this, but it's also unlocking a lot more around what we can do as an organization. And so, yeah, we're excited about the future. We do think there's really good productivity opportunities for us for quite some time. The 27 pipeline is being built right now for us to go execute against. And we feel really good about our ability to finish out 26 well, too.

Executive Christian (Title): Yeah, absolutely. And I think additional comment about where are we in this journey? You know, we've had good success, especially, you know, the back half of fiscal 24, as we set a new base, 25 and now 26. And we're operationalizing this. So this becomes a part of the total companies operating rhythm, you know, as, you know, enshrined in the Rockwell operating model. And so additional work to make this just a fundamental part of what we do going forward that's not relying on individual heroics. It's a part of our processes, I think, is the exciting part of the journey that we're in now.

Analyst Quinn Fredrickson (Baird): Yes, thanks for the question. Just wondering if you could unpack a bit more of your expectations around discrete for the back half, just given the really strong start you're off to in the first half and the sequential acceleration you saw this quarter. The full year guide would seem to imply some deceleration in the back half. Is that just a function of comps get tougher or some conservatism embedded around CapEx or any other factors to call out?

Executive Blake (Title): So, I'll start with, I can start with some comments about discrete. You know, for the full year, we're looking at discrete being up low double digits. We continue to expect automotive for the year to be up mid-single digits. Semiconductor, which we talked about a little bit on this call, up around 10%. And then e-commerce and warehouse automation up around 20%. So discrete is a good industry and market force. We're seeing growth in hybrid and process as well, as we've talked about, but I'd say discrete with e-commerce and warehouse automation, data center, you know, that's a strong force right now. And just to build off of that, we are still looking at modest sequential growth in discrete as we go through the remainder of the year. Yes, indeed, the comps get harder as we go through the second half of the year. And that's not just in discrete, that's also in the overall organization.

Analyst Quinn Fredrickson (Baird): Okay. And then specifically within automotive, just wonder if you could unpack a little bit more the strength you did see relative to the fact that CapEx still is weaker. Is that being driven mostly by ARR or just healthy brownfields, share gains, just any color there, and then any visibility on when the CapEx side might start to turn based on your customer discussions?

Executive Blake (Title): Sure. So in automotive, you know, we've seen the brand owners, you know, balance their approach. So, you know, internal combustion engines, where we have such a large installed base, you know, is still a very important part of their portfolios. They're making investments in hybrid, and there's some in battery electric, but I'd say hybrid has been a more recent source of focus. We've got that installed base across our hardware portfolio, but also some of the new ways to win that we've added. So Plex with tier suppliers, fixed or maintenance, autonomous mobile robots. Automotive is the single largest vertical for AMRs, and we saw some great wins recently there. So I think that characterizes it. Now, in terms of when we could see an upturn in more wholesale capital spending and automotive, I think the tariffs are a big part of that. Everybody's watching USMCA as those negotiations begin, and it's especially important for the automotive companies.

Analyst Amit Mehrotra (UBS): Thanks, operator. Morning, everybody. I wanted to just double-click on warehouse automation growth. Obviously, that's been very robust. I just wanted to ask a little bit more color. Is that a few large customers restarting spending, or are you seeing demand broadening out and then just related to that, can you talk about how margins compare in that vertical versus maybe the company average?

Executive Blake (Title): Yeah, so I'll talk about four main aspects of e-commerce and warehouse automation. First is the data center component. The second is new fulfillment centers with e-commerce. Third is production logistics, which is where companies, in many cases consumer packaged goods companies, are seeing dramatic increases in efficiency by improving the flow of components and material to the production line and then finished goods taken to the loading dock or into the warehouse. And then parcel handling companies as well. So it's fairly broad-based. There's some different customers in each one of those, let's say, subsegments, but they're all robust. And when we look at the profile of what's being provided there, it's really more weighted towards hardware. And it's just the standard products. It's logics. It's motion control for products, you know, conveyors and diverters. It's sensors from our industrial components business. So it's, you know, products that we've been known for for a long time in a vertical that's experiencing a very high sustained level of multi-year investment.

Executive Blake (Title): Regarding the margin profile, these are, keep in mind for Rockwell, our offerings are horizontal. That is, we're able to use the same products and solutions for lots of different applications. The end result is that it is a similar margin profile by offering. Now, it depends on what exactly is being given in the warehouse automation space. So really, the difference in profitability and warehouse automation for us has to do with the products versus solutions and the mix of those that we see. And that really depends on customer and application. But overall, the margin profile is similar to other offerings.

Analyst Amit Mehrotra (UBS): Got it. Great. Thank you. And then just as a follow up, one thing I noticed is obviously more balanced growth between North America and Asia-Pac. Can you just talk about if you're seeing the international market catch up? It's primarily been kind of a North American-led story, and that's your biggest growth region. But I'm curious if you're seeing EMEA and Asia-Pac kind of accelerate as well.

Executive Blake (Title): Sure. So, as you noted, it's good balanced growth in the quarter. We do expect for the full year that North America will be highest. But when we look at what is contributing to the growth in Europe, it's, you know, largely the strength of machine builders. We saw it high single digit growth in Germany, we saw low double digit growth in Italy, you know, two of the more machine builder intensive countries for us. And that's, you know, certainly for, you know, machinery that's bound for the US, but also other parts of the world, because our portfolio is becoming more and more competitive for applications where, you know, the U.S. is not part of the mix. In Asia, we saw growth in China in the quarter, led largely by semiconductor in Taiwan. We've got some very large customers there, and, you know, we talked about semiconductor more generally, but that was a particularly strong spot there. And then in growth in other countries in Asia as well. I would characterize the growth in Asia as systems integrators, engineering firms, users, and machine builders. In Europe, probably a little bit more concentrated on machine builders. From a comparable perspective, I just want to point out that Q2 last year, Asia Pacific and EMEA were down year-over-year. North America was flat year-over-year, so our comps were a little bit easier.

Analyst Andrew Buscalia (BNP Paribas): Hi. Good morning, everyone. A similar question on the end markets and regions. You know, I think inter-quarter, you see the geopolitics, you know, heighten, energy prices up a lot. And I think there's a lot of concerns around what that means for your process business, both near and long-term. Can you talk about how process shook out inter-quarter? It sounded fine, but what are your thoughts long-term in that segment?

Executive Blake (Title): Yeah, look, we're excited to bring back the oil and gas-focused process automation business from Sensia into full control under Rockwell. And that business specifically is about 10% of our total energy, if you include other forms of energy, is about 15%. And we specifically called that out as you said, a good contributor in the quarter. People are going to be concerned about efficiency. They're taking a very disciplined approach to capital, and particularly where we're most exposed upstream, there's still a lot of opportunity to increase the efficiency of those operations, either in process control with logics, power control with our variable speed drives, digitization, so providing digital twins of those processes to de-bottleneck. All the things that we've talked about in other industries are opportunities there. We talked about a nice FPSO win in Brazil in the quarter. LNG, although it's a relatively small part of our total exposure in oil and gas, is obviously doing very well and participating in some compressor trains there. Look, there's a strong correlation between energy abundance and standard of living around the world. And we expect to be able to continue to participate in that. We're all very concerned about the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. We see that on our business as having paused certain projects. But in general, we don't expect a material impact on our business results for the year.

Analyst Andrew Buscalia (BNP Paribas): Okay, that's helpful. And I wanted to check on one other thing within software and control so you know the second set of second quarter in a row of great results and that margin of close to 35 I know you're signaling you know near term you know that's that's going to be a down but what you know, what were the biggest factors driving that performance in Q2? And is that a high watermark we likely don't see for a long time? Or is that kind of where you think that margin can shake out, you know, over the medium term?

Executive Christian (Title): Yeah. So I'll make some comments, and then Christian may have some additional thoughts on it. Look, we're very proud of the way logics is trending. We've talked about a 31% to 34% margin corridor you know in our midterm targets. We're happy to have performed above that in this quarter. Volume certainly helps productivity is helping their software in software and control, you know, a very profitable plex business for instance, certainly helped that. And as we said, ARR for software was up high single digits in the quarter. So we are, we're proud of that. We're looking to sustain high levels of margin performance in that business, of course. But we, you know, indicated some of the factors, you know, in the second half of the year. And I think we're just, we want to make sure we're being prudent about how we think about that performance.

Executive Blake (Title): Blake just highlighted a bunch of things of all conversion went really well for us in the second quarter. When we think about third quarter and second half overall, though, we do have those inflationary impacts that are definitely coming into play. The memory side, it's real. We also have some additional engineering and development spend and other project spend. And importantly, Q2, the discipline spending was outstanding, and that was great. But I think, again, to be prudent, we're expecting that there's going to be some spending that comes back in the second half for us. So really strong quarter for software and control. Really happy for all of us in that group. But again, trying to make sure we're balanced as we think about the full year.

Executive Christian (Title): Okay, fair enough. Thank you.

Executive Blake (Title): That concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining us today.

At this time, you may disconnect.

Thank you.