Back
Earnings Call Transcripts

Planet Labs PBC

PL
Quarters2 Quarters
ContentQ&A Sections
SourceEarnings Conference Call
Quarter 1

Q4 2026 Earnings Call — March 19, 2026

Colin Canfield (Cantor): Can you perhaps update us on the timing and the scaling of both the Suncatcher opportunity as well as what sounds like a pretty nascent geointelligence platform within NVIDIA? And then if you could maybe talk about how much of that was included in the set of opportunities from the Investor Day. Thank you.

Management: Both are very exciting opportunities and in a way both involve both a space component and an AI component. Let me talk to the Google one first, since you brought that up. Suncatcher, it's going well. It's early days. Just to recap that project, this is about putting their TPUs into space. It's an early tech demo. That is what we're doing right this second for them. It's a lot of interest in that space that you've seen in recent months. It's very exciting. It's heating up. But we're focused on executing towards those research goals. As Sundar put it, I think within 10 years, he expects most compute spending to go into orbit. That's a big amount of money. That's a huge, huge market to go after, but with very early dates. So, you know, it's exciting. We're staying focused on executing on those early missions.

And then to NVIDIA, yeah, that is also exciting. It was great to announce that extension of our partnerships. It's also a research partnership at this stage. You all know about the fact that we've been putting those NVIDIA GPUs into orbit on our Pelican spacecraft, which is pretty cool. This is actually more focused on the compute on the ground, how we leverage their GPUs in particular to speed up our data processing pipeline. In an increasingly fast changing world, people want those answers really quickly. And GPUs have the potential to really speed things up. We've seen some early results that are very promising where big speed ups like 100x on certain parts of our coding base, getting answers to our clients faster is really important. So research collaboration, they're leaning in and we are leaning in too. It's very exciting. But as to the revenue implications, I don't know if you wanted to touch on that. I mean, I would just remind you that the Suncatcher partnership is structured as an R&D partnership, so it's recognized as contra revenue. And with respect to the NVIDIA partnership, that's really just a research collaboration. Yes, R&D.

Colin Canfield (Cantor): Got it. And then as we think about imputing working capital tailwinds for 2027, is there a right framework to think about it, maybe as like a percentage of the backlog increase or kind of high-level, kind of what are the building blocks on working capital that we should consider?

Management: First of all, I just want to correct myself. I made a misstatement on my prior answer. It's not contra revenue. It's contra R&D expense. Thanks for letting me clarify that. As for your second question in terms of the building blocks for working capital, obviously, as I said, as we are acquiring investments to execute on our backlog, that includes all of the capital expenditures we need to make to build out the pelicans for our customers. That obviously will weigh into the procurements quarter to quarter. The nice thing about the way these contracts are structured is they typically provide us upfront capital to match the timing of those expenses, at least on an annual basis. There may be differentials quarter to quarter as to when we make procurements and when we receive milestone payments. So as I said in the prepared remarks, Cash flow is expected to vary quarter to quarter, but on an annualized basis, these contracts really enable us to operate the business in a free cash flow positive way.

Ryan Coots (Needham & Co.): Great. Thanks for the questions, and congrats on a great quarter outlook. Starting with maybe some of the segment, what your real strength you saw in Europe in the quarter. I wonder if you can maybe unpack that for us. You know, what were some of the drivers behind that? Obviously, a lot of defense work there, but any kind of color you can give us on the European market and how that's been progressing so well for you.

Management: Yeah, well, maybe I can kick it off. I spent quite a big fraction of the quarter in Europe going to a number of capitals, speaking to a lot of our customers there. The demand is off the charts. We are leaning into it as best we can, both for our data and AI solutions and constellation services. We talked about the interest in that going up. Yeah, I mean, it's back to the geopolitical dynamics, right? That's what's underneath this and driving a lot of this demand. They need their own sovereign systems. They need it quickly. They need speed and sovereignty. And we can offer both of those things. Speed, immediate access to our present satellites. Sovereignty, building satellites dedicated for them. And even that we can do very swiftly compared with anyone else. And our history of having launched hundreds of satellites really puts us in a great position to do that.

So that's the sort of demand signal actually towards the breakdown. I don't know if you want to comment at all on that. We provide the breakdown and the materials. I would just say, you know, we have historically had a very strong presence in Europe and have a strong team in Berlin foundationally, and we've built on that with acquisitions that have given us presence in the Netherlands as well as in Slovenia. And that really helps us when we're engaging with governments across both their civil and defense and intelligence needs. And if I could just add one final thing, of course, our commitment to building satellites there in Berlin adds to that interest. I mean, we both needed it for expanded manufacturing for our pelicans, and it lent into the European demand because, of course, that helps connect the dots there.

Ryan Coots (Needham & Co.): Sure, that's great. And just any comments around supply chain right now? Is it getting more difficult to acquire the types of key components you need on the supply chain side?

Management: Not really, no. We're not seeing anything material. Obviously, it's something that we check carefully. Our teams are always seeking to diversify our supply chain sources.

Edison Yu (Dutch Bank): Thank you very much, and congratulations on the quarter. I want to come back to the AI element. You talked a little bit about LLMs. What's the latest, I guess, status on the Anthropic Partnership, and have we kind of progressed further from kind of just testing or early testing the models or the training?

Management: Yeah, I mean, AI in general, as I said, we're moving from this world of LLMs that couldn't tell you about things about the text of the internet to how models are increasingly trying to move towards real-world models and real-world models needing real-world data has this stack that's necessary. We're doing these research collaborations that we've mentioned and they're very exciting. What they're really building a foundation towards is we've been building these bespoke solutions, these what we call AI enabled solutions for our board area PlanetScope daily scan. So the maritime domain awareness solution, the global monitoring solution, and the area monitoring solution for civil government. And those are really good and they're starting to take off and that's what's driving a lot of the great growth that you're seeing in the numbers.

AI has the potential of making that more generic, that is that anyone can turn up build their own spoke application of equivalent fidelity. In short order, like maybe within an hour, and you know, in a completely bespoke way for their needs that is just on the horizon, and so what we're focused on with those research collaborations is how we can build towards that capability. And that is what, I mean, what's so exciting about that is the ability to unlock all the potential of our data, especially for commercial and civil government markets where we've been less focused of late because of the strong interest on the defense and intelligence side, but our huge markets for planet. So basically, um, that's the direction and leaning of those partnerships is enabling us to build out that capability to expand the town.

Edison Yu (Dutch Bank): Absolutely just to follow up on that yeah yeah just just to follow up on that to try get get there what do you see as the biggest um I don't want a bottleneck or or thing we should look out for is it a question of just Do you need more compute? Is it a question of just, you know, it takes time, more training? Like, how do you think about, like, the path there and the bottlenecks?

Management: Well, it's complex and evolving in that the space is changing so fast. I mean, literally, we are seeing capabilities that just a couple of months ago we weren't able to do because of the advances in especially coding like that that makes it now that you can even build whole applications very quickly, so we are just seeing that potentially take off much faster than we thought. There's nothing really standing in the way per se, we have the data that's the critical ingredient and it's the differentiating ingredient for AI. And as I said briefly, like, I mean, in many ways, AI, it's making the commoditizing more the software layer that's making the AI piece, the data piece most useful for AI. And so that's very differentiating that we have this unique data set coming into it. So there's nothing holding us back there. And it's moving very fast. And that's why I was saying that I think you're going to start to see this come to fruition this year. So watch this space.

Christine Leeweg (Morgan Stanley): Hi, this is Gabby on for Christine. Congratulations on the quarter. Given your recent decision to extend the satellite imagery delay in the Middle East to 14 days as a result of the ongoing conflict, have you seen any changes in customer behavior and are there any potential contractual implications that we should maybe be aware of?

Management: Yeah, I mean, the short answer is nothing material. Look, what we're focused on there is helping our critical customers in the region do the things they need, which is get critical answers fast and trying to help them through that. We're focused and mainly heads down on supporting those customers in this critical time as best we can. The delay is a lot to do with the balance of thinking about those operational needs and making sure we don't put people in harm's way and it's very genuine needs. At the same time, our transparency and accountability mission that we care about and ensuring all of our actors get access eventually. So it's a carefully thought through decision and we're just trying to do our best to help the people that need it.

Christine Leeweg (Morgan Stanley): Thank you. Super helpful color. And if I can ask a quick follow up, I mean, you announced the satellite services agreement with Sweden in January. Can you just talk about how you're seeing the pipeline for similar deals progressing relative to what you had laid out at the investor day? And what are you seeing in terms of conversion timelines and potential scale of upcoming opportunities?

Management: Yeah, I mean, as I've mentioned in my prepared remarks since that October investor day, both the number and the average size of those deals has been increasing. And so, I mean, just to give you a sense that it is. It is a strong market demand right now, even stronger than we had said then. And, you know, it's a bit too early to talk about sort of average deal length because it's just these are very few in number, right? So I haven't got any comments to that effect. But overall, the demand is very strong.

Jeff Benry (Craig Hallum Capital Group): Great thanks for taking the questions guys and congrats. A lot here to love let me start um first with civil civil commercial about 40 a little less than that of uh as percent of revenues what do you think you know when you look at those markets obviously dni is killing it you've got a lot of sovereign deals flowing through and and it makes sense to be pursuing those deals I'm wondering how you think about civil and commercial and what dynamics have to play out for those markets to re-accelerate.

Management: Well, as I said, see earlier answer to Edison about the AI piece, because that's what unlocks these things and enables it. And we're just on the precipice of that. And so, yeah, I see that beginning to come this year. And just to be clear, in my opinion, the biggest markets are those two segments, not defense and intelligence. And we think that's a long and sustaining and really great market. But the civil government market is huge. The commercial market is huge. There's so many, but it's been lacking those critical solutions. Here we have a generic way of crossing that chasm to the fuller solution that enables us to unlock that market. And so we know those capabilities, those answers are latent in our data, and this gives the bridge to the actual solution that the customers need. So, I mean, you know, it's back to my earlier point. AI is going to enable it, and I think we're going to see the beginnings of that really take off this year.

Jeff Benry (Craig Hallum Capital Group): Yep. And over to the sovereign deals for a second. I mean, obviously, what, three mega deals here roughly trailing 12 months, give or take. You know, it sounds like the pipeline is expanded. It sounds like you're thinking, you know, deal count there should improve. I mean, just any other observations on those sovereign deals on the magnitude of the growth in the pipeline? Sounds like it really accelerated even further potentially in the last 90 days.

Management: No, I didn't want to quantify that, but just give you a sense that it is really growing and it's very strong. And, yeah, that's it. And the only other thing that I would add, Jeff, which I think is an important point, is that when we are selling these sovereign capabilities, we are coupling with that our data and solutions. And it actually is the synergies across that that is a competitive differentiator because we can drive value to these customers out of the gate. We can give them visibility and intelligence that they didn't have before as we work with them over the longer term contract to build out what their sovereign capabilities will ultimately be. And so it's worth pointing out that actually a lot of our backlog growth is in data and solutions. In fact, that part of the backlog has almost doubled year over year.

Jeff Benry (Craig Hallum Capital Group): That's a great color. Last one, if I could, just on the OWLs, any updates there that you could share?

Management: Yeah, I mean, we're building that tech demo, as we announced last year, towards that improved daily scan capability. The team's working hard on it. It's quite an incredible capability that we're obviously building there. Just to remind everyone that we're moving towards one-meter scan rather than three-meter, and that's roughly 10 times more data per unit area of the ground and roughly a 10x improvement in latency as well because they will be equipped with both onboard compute systems as well as satellite telecoms so that we can get the data back as well. So those things are all going to be faster as well. So much lower latency at 10x there too. So it's really a significant improvement on that system. And yeah, we're looking forward to launching a demo.

John Gooden (Citibank): Justin Capposian, hey guys thanks for taking my question really appreciate it, I just wanted to square off the backlog strength and all of the positive commentary with revenue guidance, the revenue guidance is fantastic don't get me wrong, but even so it just seems like there's upside to it, based on a commentary of you know incredibly strong demand signals, particularly in Europe, as well as the fact that as a percentage of the backlog that you guys have right now, it doesn't seem like the revenue guide is particularly large percentage versus maybe how you've set guidance in the past.

Management: Yeah, it's obviously a good question, John. We're in a really favorable position right now in terms of the level of visibility that we have. Obviously, there's a lot of execution that goes into turning backlog into revenue, and we are laser focused on that. And in terms of setting guidance, I think what you've seen from us, particularly in recent periods, is we try to give ourselves room for the fact that on these big mission-critical types of transactions and contracts, there are things that can shift from quarter to quarter, and we want to give room in our guidance for that to happen so that we can keep our customers front and center around execution. Similarly, we have a great pipeline of opportunity, but when those deals land, given how big they can be, can really impact revenue in the year. And so we tend to assume that new signings are back half loaded, which give us opportunity to deliver upside if that doesn't end up being the case, if it ends up landing sooner, but doesn't put us in a position where we're out over our skis in terms of the numbers we've given you.

John Gooden (Citibank): Okay. That makes a lot of sense. It sounds like there are some layers of conservatism in there, which is appropriate, and we'll see how that plays out throughout the year. If I could ask one more, just in terms of the activities in the Middle East, the conflict there, do you feel that that has additionally kind of turbocharged the demand for your product in any way? I know the backdrop is strong, but has that had an obvious impact as sort of a recent event?

Management: Well, obviously there's a huge amount of focus in that, and we are, but again, as I said earlier, we're just focused on delivering pieces. We're doing mission critical things. We're trying to focus on that, but we'll see. It's early, early days. Yeah, I think, you know, one of the things that we have seen in these types of situations is you do see an increase in usage as there's just more urgency in getting as much data as possible around the situation, you know, but ultimately, as Will said, situations like this can be very dynamic.

Trevor Walsh (Citizens): Great. Hale, thanks for taking my questions. Will, you called out the SHIELD IDIQ in your prepared remarks. Can you maybe just give us a sense? early days on this very large project and a lot of it's sensitive, but can you give us a sense of how you're thinking about that opportunity? Is that something where it's just kind of bread and butter Planet Labs Earth observation data that you would be providing for that as you go after contracts and opportunities there? Or might it even look like something more of akin to satellite services where you might even just building spacecraft that are fairly non-traditional for you guys, but just being used for all the things that are part of that project?

Management: Well, yeah, as you say, it's early days. It's obviously a big opportunity. There's a huge budget behind it. But the specific ways in which we fit in will have to be figured out as we understand the architecture. And they're still working on many of those aspects. There are, of course, ways in which our present data sets could fit into that early warning of certain things, strategic analysis across board areas. That obviously makes sense. But right now, that is merely a vehicle. And when we will compete on awards within that, and that's the same for all the people that have got awards under that system. So, yeah, but obviously finding unknown unknowns, you know, there could be specific missions, but it's very early days to be thinking about that. What I will say is that we're continuing to lean into specific opportunities that are very live right now, like with Luno, with our Navy customers and others. So, you know, we're seeing a lot of interest in COCOMs around the world. So there's, you know, the department has a lot of interest across the board, and we're leaning into it.

Trevor Walsh (Citizens): Great. Awesome. Appreciate that. Ashley, maybe just one follow-up for you. I appreciate the color you gave around free cash flow. I know you guys aren't giving an official guide, but just given how strong you guys ended this current fiscal year, and as we think about 2017, there's kind of a, there's obviously a, there can be a bit of a step down from just going from 50 million to something that's just generally positive. So just want to make sure we don't get, just given the CapEx spend and everything else, if you could just give us a little bit of maybe guardrails as to how we think about that for 27, that would be great.

Management: Yeah. I mean, first I'll just reiterate the point that I made. We definitely expect there to be pretty significant fluctuations quarter to quarter. And just like I said timing of procurement versus timing of milestone payments can cause one quarter to be much more positive and another quarter to be significantly negative. So that's one caution that I provide and that makes it a little bit harder to give you know very precise guidance around it, which is why I haven't and to your point, and you know, depending on how much more of this opportunity we continue to realize it would not make sense for us to optimize expanding free cash flow on the year versus setting ourselves up to both deliver against the contracts we have and to bring more on. So if that offers enough color to you without giving specific guidance, which I'm really not in a position to do, we're not focused on, you know, kind of sustaining or expanding free cash flow from last year, but really focused on balancing it quarter to quarter and leaning into the market.

Greg Pendy (Clear Street): Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. Just one quick one, just that I understand kind of the approach on this year of leaning in, in terms of the commercial and civil side. I mean, it's hard to think back, but you did have a cost rationalization program at one time, and your sales and marketing is down around 15% from fiscal 2024, yet your revenues are up roughly 40%. So is it kind of that the customers through Anthropic will figure out how to use the data and how valuable it is into their daily workflows, or do you think that you know, you'll need some boots on the ground to educate the civil and commercial markets?

Management: Yeah, Greg, it's a very good call out. We did, you know, realign the team across the board to really focus on where we had the largest account opportunities, which I think did disproportionately impact, you know, how much resource we were putting behind going after a more distributed commercial market. And as we said, we were building out the platform to enable smaller customers to really access the data on a self-serve basis. I think as we are growing those markets and leaning into the AI that Will highlighted, we will be making some targeted investments in those markets where we're seeing the most traction out of the gate. So we do have feet on the street going and meeting with customers and demonstrating for them. And that is a really exciting part of these new capabilities that we have is we can really show, not tell in these customer meetings. All the things that you can, all the insights you can extract from the data to answer their specific questions. So we did a lot of training with our sales team earlier this year, really showing them how to use these tools and demo environments. Obviously, the world has changed a lot in the last six years. You can do a lot of that without putting people on airplanes, but it will require some investments across sales and marketing. And I did highlight that as one of the investment areas for us this year.

Alex Lattimore (Northland): Hey, guys. Excellent quarter. Alex Lattimore on here for Mike Lattimore. I had one question. I just wanted to hit on guidance one more time. Good raise on guidance. I was wondering if you could talk about what assumptions are factored into that raise on guidance. Does this assume any new eight plus figure wins or any commentary there?

Management: Yes, thanks Alex and I'd say we're very balanced in terms of how we think about those types of opportunities that may be in our pipeline, because obviously those could swing outcomes. Based on whether they come in or not so typically what we'll look at is a pipeline of opportunity. Where if an eight figure deal were to fall out of the pipeline what type of backup we have for that opportunity and then and then probability adjusted so. We are definitely looking at active opportunities, probabilities, and then giving ourselves room for those deals where maybe we don't have enough pipeline and makeup for that one landing on time or in the year, which gives us opportunity to outperform. And like I said earlier, it doesn't put us in a position where we feel over our skis.

Alex Lattimore (Northland): Awesome. And then one more. I just wanted to hear if there's any footholds in the Golden Dome initiative, I understand there was a 10 billion incremental add to the Golden Dome initiative for space-based capabilities. I'm not sure if you're seeing any demand there for planet systems, but any commentary around Golden Dome would be helpful.

Management: Yeah, I sort of said all that I can on that at the minute. It's very early days as they're architecting that system. And there are potentially that's, you know, the shield IDIQ, just to be clear, is the Golden Dome. And so that answer was about that. And again, it's a framework that we have. And now we will bid for actual awards under that program. But we don't know what they are exactly yet. Then when we do, we will respond. But my earlier answer, the general thing is giving domain awareness and other things that could be useful for that. But we obviously have to wait and see what comes through that.

Caleb Henry (Quilty Space): Hi guys thanks for the call a couple of questions on satellite manufacturing actually first one sorry on pelican I've noticed that you guys lowered one of the pelican satellites a little past 400 kilometers recently. Is that part of a larger fleet migration to a very low Earth orbit? Or is there another way that we should think about that?

Management: Yeah, we lower spacecraft, of course, to operational altitudes. And Pelican, part of the reason we call it Pelican was to fly low. Pelicans fly low to the water. And so we were mimicking that when we were talking about this. And they have ion engines such that they can fly really low. And in time, that is part of the process that gets us to the 30 centimeter ultimate resolution target for those missions. But no changes to the plan. Those were just operational adjustments as we will start always with the satellites in a slightly higher orbit and bring them down to operational orbits as we progress. And by the way, just on Pelicans, you may want to look in the associated deck with this earnings. There's a few really cool pictures of some of the fast response timelines. We had three pictures in about a year. It's very exciting to see in about an hour. And just other great performance of that system. So it's very exciting. And we've got multiple launches for more of those systems going up this year. So it's exciting times.

Caleb Henry (Quilty Space): And was there a broader question about the manufacturing?

Management: Yeah, I definitely kind of looked through these pictures, but looking at the contract for Sweden and tie that into manufacturing, is that, can you give a sense of when those satellites are supposed to be delivered and how many satellites? Is that sort of the reason for the ramp up in manufacturing space in California?

Management: Uh, no, nothing specific. I'm going to say specifically to that customer, but we're ramping up because of the demand overall. Right. And, and we're building fleets for multiple customers as well as for our own system. And that demand is obviously already clear such that we're expanding here in San Francisco and in Berlin.

Caleb Henry (Quilty Space): Okay. And then last question, I was just curious if you could shed more light on what makes 2026 the year you first anticipate seeing a return on investment on AI. Was there more of an aha moment that happened, or is this just the natural evolution of user investment and how customers use planned data?

Management: Yeah, and that's an oversimplification because, I mean, we've had revenue from AI a fair bit before. What I mean is in terms of the big way in which AI can unleash those other market potential, and I think we're going to really start to see those generic solutions that I mentioned, ways in which anyone can turn up, build an application that's relevant to their needs, and then start getting value. That unlocks other markets that we've been talking about for years that are latent in our data, agriculture, energy, insurance, finance, so on. I think that it's just more that I see that all the pieces are coming together such that that will come to fruition this year and you will start to really see that take off. Just like, you know, the Constellation satellite services really started to take off in FY26. Thank you.

Quarter 2

Q3 2026 Earnings Call — December 10, 2025

Ryan Kuntz (Needham): Terrific quarter, guys. Just outstanding in the October quarter. I wanted to ask about the guide a little bit here. You know, in terms of the revenue and the margin guide down, is the revenue down on the one-time benefits on usage in the past quarter and in the gross margin guide down? Is that mostly tied to some of your large international programs you're ramping?

Ashley (Management): In terms of Q3 to Q4 trends, a couple of factors to keep in mind. So I did highlight that there were some one-time items in Q3. Those can be related to renewals of certain contracts that have archived components. You know, anytime we have any kind of bonus payments or deliverables, that can factor into a quarter that obviously wouldn't continue into the next. And then I mentioned there was some upside that was driven by the timing of landing new business. That does continue into Q4, and you see that rolling through. That's balanced against, we mentioned that both the NASA contract and the EOCL contracts were downsized, so we have to factor that revenue drop into the Q4 guide, and so that is fully factored into the guidance that we've given, and that results in that quarter-to-quarter flatness, just like down that we guided to. In terms of margin, we're both investing in the opportunity that we see, as we've highlighted, investing into execution against our satellite services contracts, which continue to perform well. And also with awards like LUNO-B, those are with partners, and so we do have partner fees that go into COGS that get layered into Q4, and that also causes some margin compression quarter to quarter. So those are the factors that really comes down to mix of business and the fact that we are investing because we see a lot of opportunity in front of us.

Ryan Kuntz (Needham): And just a clarification, those partner fees, are those front-loaded in some way before revenue hits? Or how should we think about how those kind of behave in the future?

Ashley (Management): No, they align to revenue.

Ryan Kuntz (Needham): Got it. And maybe a quick question on the acquisition of Bedrock. I mean, which sectors are these guys focused on and what sort of data does Bedrock integrate?

Ashley (Management): Bedrock is fantastic. It's a small team, but they're very, very talented at the intersection of remote sensing, AI, and national security. Very, very good, solid team there. What we see them doing, I mean, we already work with them with actual customers as we're building out our GMS solution, and it's been working really well. So we thought bringing them in-house would help us to scale and speed that execution faster and make it more efficient to the margins point we were just discussing.

Ryan Kuntz (Needham): Got it. And what sort of data do they deal with? Is it all primarily your data, or do they bring other data sources together?

Ashley (Management): Well, they've done multiple different data sets in the past public and primarily though national security data sets on contract with the government so it's a variety of things and it's this sort of versatile approach that they've been doing using embeddings a technology we've been also working with in our AI modeling and so it's a kind of very generic, scalable solution that can work across different data streams.

Edison Yu (Deutsche Bank): Hi. Thank you, and congrats on the very impressive quarter. I wanted to ask about Fodrick Suncatcher. There's been a lot of talk, a lot of excitement about, you know, data centers in space. Can you give us a sense on how you think about just the feasibility and viability of this and how does one kind of measure that going forward?

Executive (Management): Suncatcher is really exciting. I do think it's a very viable project long term. It's – You know, we have spoken in the space sector for some decades about how as space infrastructure costs come down, it eventually makes sense to put compute into space and other energy-intensive infrastructure. And to your point about the feasibility of scaling it, well, that is hard, right? And there's only a couple of companies in the world that have done scaled constellations, basically us and SpaceX. And, therefore, knowing how to put that get costs down is something that really is an incredible advantage we have in the position in going into this. It's one of the reasons, obviously, we're very proud that Google selected us. I see a huge market opportunity here. I do in the long run. This is just an R&D at this phase. This is an R&D contract. We're going to do these couple of demo satellites that will test out some of the critical components of that, like shedding heat from the TPUs into outer space, and doing the formation flying, building towards a cluster system approach, which is the architecture that the Google and Planet teams have been designing towards, and we think the most efficient approach to this. So, yeah, so in summary, it's early days, but an exciting potential project for Planet, really exciting.

Edison Yu (Deutsche Bank): Just one follow-up. I think you mentioned in the prepared remarks that you're using the same bus as Al. Are there any special kind of design changes you need to make on the bus, anything you need to do differently, just from an engineering perspective, given it's a TPU?

Executive (Management): Yeah, I mean, there's a few things, but not much on the scale of things. For example, we're expanding the number of solar panels a little bit and a few things like that. But on the scale of the hard, complex things of the avionics and all those systems, how they work together, it's primarily the same at this stage. And that's why, I mean, you know, there's two big reasons we did this project. The tactical level one was how aligned it was to our project for the point on the same bus. And the second is that there's an option on a big program in the future, you know, to the earlier point. I mean, I think this is a big market. So let's take advantage of the fact that we're one of a couple of companies that can do it. I'll just add as well that, you know, Planet, we've been saying, is a space and AI company. And I think, you know, we have the credibility to say that we're the first one in a way to prove that. We've obviously got scaled satellite stuff, so we're a space company. We've got that scale use of AI based on our daily scan, and we've already been putting NVIDIA chips in space on satellites, including the ones that were launched just 12 days ago. And so we're already familiar with putting compute in space. So it's a natural extension of where we're going to think about AI and space together in this way, and so Planet is incredibly well positioned for that, we believe.

Mike Lattimore (Northland): Excellent. Thanks. Yeah, excellent results. I guess on the quarter, I think you said J-SAT was one of the drivers of maybe the upside. Can you talk a little bit about, you know, is J-SAT sort of ahead of schedule and maybe just generally how is the J-SAT in Germany deals proceeding relative to maybe your internal timelines?

Executive (Management): You know, obviously this was the first time we had engaged in this type of contract. And so while we have obviously agreed milestones with the end customer, we gave ourselves some flexibility for, you know, when certain milestones might get hit for the year and you know, obviously that flexibility translates also into how we guide. And so that team continuing to execute and meet and hopefully exceed the customer's expectations also results in upside in our financial forecast. I would just add, yeah, I mean, overall things are going very well with those programs. And, you know, we're very focused on our commitments to those customers. And, yeah, things are going great overall. and the pipeline of opportunities for first deals is going really well as well. So, yeah, we're very happy with that side of the business team.

Mike Lattimore (Northland): Great. And then, Ashley, did you say that you expect the fourth quarter kind of implied growth rate to be sort of continue into fiscal 27? Is that what you said?

Ashley (Management): I did, yeah. So as we're looking at the shape of the business and kind of the drivers of growth, Q4 is pretty indicative of how we see things going forward. Obviously, I've mentioned the change in the government contracts. Those go into full effect in Q4. We've obviously continued to land new business and expand relationships both with the U.S. government and international governments. And we expect across all of the areas of business to continue to focus on converting the pipeline that we have. So, we're very comfortable that is kind of a target for growth going into fiscal 27. And, you know, also as we think about margins next year, you know, that's a pretty good benchmark to use as a reference. We said at the beginning of the year we would accelerate the revenue growth rate, and here we are, and it's nice to be in a position where we can see that continuing into the next year. And then the only qualifier I'd add to that is reference back to the Investor Day materials where obviously, you know, we're – thinking about FY27 very actively right now, and we continue to uphold a commitment to targeting EBITDA breakeven or better, as well as maintaining our annual cash flow positivity.

Colin Canfield (Cantor Fitzgerald): Colin, are you there?

Colin Canfield (Cantor Fitzgerald): Thank you. Apologies. Zoom mechanics. So just going back to the pipeline that you put together for the investor day, call it 20 contracts, average contract value of $170 million. That tracks pretty closely to kind of the F-35 friends and family. So as we think of kind of drawing comparisons between that portfolio of opportunities and the companies that we're looking at, how do you kind of think about the sizing and magnitude of those awards? I mean, is it fair to assume that, like, we could see, you know, 20% of that pipeline convert and maybe the magnitude of that pipeline looking similar, you know, as a factor of the J-SAT and Germany deal such that maybe it's, like, 100 million awards up front? Like, how do we think about kind of that – just the timing and magnitude of that pipeline?

Executive (Management): Yeah, well, yeah, I mean, firstly, I mean, I think Planet is extremely well positioned for this market. I mean, we're the only ones that have built hundreds of Earth imaging satellites. We've got 600 so far. So these countries, when they want sovereign satellites, especially at least in optical, we're the obvious first call. Yeah, we feel well positioned against those 20 or so opportunities. We're focused on a half dozen or so that are a little bit more mature, and those ones are doing very, very well. When we really go in, I think we've got a higher probability than that, but time will tell exactly how this turns out. We are committed to really executing on this business side and being a reliable partner with these countries, building off a long-term relationship we've had with them in most cases. And so, yeah, overall, very good about where it's going. Did that answer your question? I'm not sure all the stuff is in your question.

Colin Canfield (Cantor Fitzgerald): Yeah, no worries. I think timing probably might be a little bit too aggressive in terms of answering the question. So good to hear that you're well-positioned and looking forward to seeing those awards. Maybe pivoting to putting some numbers around SunCatcher. So if we think of the 81 cluster concept, let's call it $250,000 to $300,000 per satellite, a million per cluster, is it fair to assume that that has some value capture tail on top of that such that it can be above, call it an initial award of 81 million? And then just a high-level question, as we think of Google's R&D budget of call it $30 billion a year, and the concept that a lot of these AI companies you know, people that are basically chasing data centers and the like, are now pivoting that R&D spend from the development of the systems to the scaling of systems, and that scaling of systems likely going through space infrastructure versus terrestrial. So maybe $81 million, is that fair, or is it above that? And how do we think of kind of that longer-term scaling opportunity into that Google R&D wallet?

Executive (Management): Yeah, well, firstly, what we're on contract to do with Google is a couple of demo satellites. It's really just the testing early phase. We're not getting into the scale cluster. You're referring to the paper that they put out where they were talking about 81 satellites in the cluster. That's more to do with the architecture that we're building long term. I think you're right to point out that this will take significant R&D dollars, and these companies are going to be willing to put dollars behind it, because if it has the cost advantages, which we believe it will, and the experiments will need to show that, this is a scaled operation. It would require thousands of satellites and many other things. But at this point, we're very early on, and I think it's important to think about, you know, Google choosing us in this process is a huge compliment to us, of course. But one of the reasons is that we're one of the few companies that has done this at scale, as I said in my prior remarks. And so even though it's on an R&D scale at this stage, we think we're one of the few players that can really build that out.

It is not trivial to put up huge numbers of satellites in a cost-efficient way. There's literally only a couple of companies in the world that have done that. And to boot, Planet, as I was mentioning in my earlier remarks, really the first proven space and AI company. We've already put fast processors in space. We already do a huge amount of AI work. And so our collaboration and a bunch of that AI work with Google, we've got a partnership with the Gemini team, and we've got a long trusted record working with them. So, you know, I think Planet is well positioned. Again, it's an early option, early contract on R&D, but it's an option on a big long-term future the planet is well positioned to be taking part in.

Jeff Van Rie (Craig Allum Capital): Great. Thanks for taking the question, Alain. My congratulations. Just a few left for me. Will, on the compute front, you know, as it relates to, obviously, congrats on what you're doing with Google, and you've been ahead of that in your platform already. Just talk about the demand pull. You're pushing it, but to what degree are people ready to consume it, demanding it, having use cases already pegged out and driving value from it?

Executive (Management): You mean demanding compute in space? Well, look, I mean, this is really talking about putting compute in space because ultimately, as launch costs and satellite infrastructure costs come down, there's a point at which it becomes more economically feasible to put those entire data centers in space. So it's not about any particular compute demand. It's about the entire compute demand in principle. But that, you know, depends on us getting that cost threshold. You know, I think it's the position of Google and Planet that we are just, you know, a few years away from that, and therefore it's the right time to start investing in R&D. There are some types of compute demand that more lend themselves to space than others, but generally we're talking about, you know, the entirety of that business. I would just say I think similar to Sundar, he was talking about this last week and talking about how in 10 years' time he thinks most compute will be going up to space. So that's the way I perceive it too. So that's the way I think we should think about it.

Jeff Van Rie (Craig Allum Capital): That's fair. Two last, if I could, then. One, as it relates to Pelican, congrats. You know, real quick, first-line imagery. Is there a number in the sky or a particular point in time this year? Just talk maybe to whatever degree you can share how that revenue layers in, if it just tends to be very gradual, if there are going to be lumps in that.

Executive (Management): Yeah, absolutely. Let me take the second one first. I mean, I just came back from D.C., and I can tell you that there is a lot of interest in this administration in leveraging new tech to drive real mission value in the DoD. And we sit firmly in that area. And so we are seeing them leaning in. So despite what you're seeing there with the UCL, A, it's growing. But more importantly, they are leaning in heavily. In fact, I mean, we see this, of course, in the numbers already. You know, the Lunar Award, the Navy expansion, and so on. they're already leaning into this stuff, but I think we're going to see it in a big way coming. So I think the outlook is really very positive.

Jeff Van Rie (Craig Allum Capital): What was the first part of the question again?

Executive (Management): First part of the question is, you know, as we continue to launch Pelicans, how do we see revenue flowing in?

Executive (Management): Okay. I see it more gradual. Yeah, as we continue to bring on contracts, and obviously if we land bigger contracts, we talked about we have a framework contract in place already for Pelican or for high-res in general with USG under EOCL. There's opportunities to expand that. There's opportunities, obviously, to expand with many of our existing customers and new customers. So nothing at this point that would – we're causing to say there's going to be irregularities. Yeah, I think linear has to be scaled and they're scaling as the sky sets are ramping down and then rebuilding towards what we've said before, ultimately a 30 satellite fleet with 30 revisits a day, 30-minute latency and all this. And, yeah, we're already seeing customers very excited about leveraging that data, and I'm glad you did. I saw that first light. It was impressive of the team to bring that out the next day, I think, the first light came out. So it's really fast how quickly they are able to process all of this and get those satellites up to – it's almost routinized at this point that we can launch these satellites and get them going. It's really cool.

Christine (Morgan Stanley): Great. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I guess, you know, look, you've delivered four consecutive quarters of positive adjusted EBITDA and, you know, the loss for 4Q is really driven by incremental investments, which are all good problems. Can you parse out how much these investments are for 4Q, their duration into fiscal year 27? And if we take out these investments, would fiscal year 27 be adjusted EBITDA profitable?

Ashley (Management): So, first of all, at the investor day, I talked about the fact that for fiscal 27, we are targeting 4Q. EBITDA profitability is one of the metrics that as we're doing our fiscal 27 planning, we are keeping in mind to break even or better. So I urge you to look back at some of those materials where we talked about just general framing for thinking about that year. For Q4 specifically, it's kind of a step up. as we're ramping up some new contracts and then scaling the revenue alongside of it. So as that revenue continues to scale, that gives us the opportunity to sustain these investments but get to that adjusted EBITDA break-even or better goal. So really the key for us is balancing the opportunity for growth that we see with, you know, sustaining profitability across the business.

Christine (Morgan Stanley): Yes, super helpful. And if I could do a follow-on, you know, the AXA contract that you mentioned earlier, if you think about the opportunity set for that kind of insurance-type business, when you sign on incremental customers, how scalable is your capability set there regarding profitability? Like, would you sign on new customers and have incrementally higher profits? Like, how do we think about that versus incremental investments you would have to make if you sign on customers similar to what they're already doing?

Ashley (Management): Yeah, and highly scalable. And, I mean, the direct margins of this sort of data business is extremely high. I mean, in the 90s percent. What we did with AXA is really cool because just think about it very practically. They're trying to make a claims processing more efficient. Take natural disasters like floods or fires, have quicker assessments of losses and damages. And instead of people having to send individuals out to check, they can, in many cases, just check that with the satellite imagery automatically from their computer. I mean, this is a huge efficiency saving across a big business. That's why AXA has not just bought some data for their own use. They're also putting it on their platform, exactly to your point about scaling it up to other insurance companies in their network, in their partner network, on their platform. And, yeah, the incremental margins on that are really great. And, you know, I see lots of potential customers like that in the future. We think the commercial business is going to continue to grow really well in the long term. And, yeah, I mean, things like insurance and finance we believe are massive markets for us to go over after. So I hope that answers the questions.

Trevor Walsh (Citizens JMP): Great. Can you guys hear me okay?

Executive (Management): Yep.

Trevor Walsh (Citizens JMP): Cool. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess around the Lunal B contract and the upside in the quarter, For Will or for Ashley, jump ball. But can you maybe explain or go into a little bit more detail as to how – that just seems like a very – from kind of signing the contracting quarter and then having it immediately kind of lead to recognizing. It just seems like a nicer, just better – I guess, execution, and is that more – is that actually what happened, or was there some details around the POC being set up beforehand and just kind of getting off with that customer right away specific to MGA? Or I guess I'm trying to understand if there's going to be more kind of potential with that with some of these D&I customers where you kind of sign the deal and then leads to kind of immediate revenue impacts in that actual quarter.

Executive (Management): Yeah, I mean look we're ready to go on these things we've already got the data we've already got the analytics so they can just turn it on and the great thing I mean sometimes the government can be slow initially but when they go it can just be straight away and so we just turn it on and that's exactly what happened in this case you know um it's great to read that we primed that um and it's you know a really substantive award and it's in an area we've talked about that that NGA are leaning into a broad area lurking with AI on top, and it is an area that PlanX believes we are we believe we're we're really well positioned to do take and you know that's that's for maritime domain awareness a bit like our navy uh program and the navy has subsequently in the extensions uh been doing that as a sole source of war because we're the only ones that can do it that also speeds things up faster but yeah the main ramp here was just because we were ready to go and as soon as they would they turn us on we we we were on.

Trevor Walsh (Citizens JMP): Great. Thanks, Willis. Really helpful caller. Actually, a follow-up maybe for you. Just circling back to J-SAT and the Pelican revenues, understand that J-SAT's not included in your ACV metrics as far as the recurring piece of revenue, but can you just help us understand or remind us exactly how, as you build the 10 or so satellites specific to J-SAT and that revenue flows in, is that going to create kind of a one-time you know, non-recurring type of bump in a particular quarter, which we won't really see in that ACV metric because you're not including that in there. And so, in other words, you have a big revenue bump, but you still have – that's not recurring, but you have 97%, you know, percent kind of similar to this quarter type of a metric. So not a good way to necessarily kind of track that, if that makes sense. Can you maybe just help us understand the dynamics there?

Ashley (Management): Yeah, happy to. And, I mean, basically – You can see this in our, when we talk about RPOs and backlog and next 12-month revenue. It is more gradual. There might be some lumpiness quarter to quarter, but it's minimal. It's not something that's going to, you know, cause things to swing wildly. But so, I would say the majority of our revenue still is coming from our traditional ACB business, and it is a very good indicator that we use both on, you know, internal managing that growth versus profitability balance, also looking at the health of the business, looking at renewal rates and that recurring revenue. And then the nice thing about contracts like JSAT and other consolation services contracts that we're either, you know, engaged or pursuing is that, it actually aligns the revenue quite nicely to the lifetime of the satellite. So while there is an upfront component of the revenue, there is also a managed component of the revenue that spreads the revenue over the lifetime of the satellite. So it's a mix. It's a little hard to overlay it directly to our traditional ACV metrics, which is why we exclude it. But it is still very predictable revenue and obviously enables us to accelerate the build out of that 30 Pelican fleet that we talked about, which we think gives us a great competitive advantage and competitive offering.

Greg Pandy (Clear Street): Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on the quarter. Just a real quick one. I think you mentioned there was some weakness in agriculture on the commercial side and some seasonality. Is that just the overall pressure we're hearing about in the agricultural sector, and could you just provide a little bit of color on that?

Ashley (Management): Yeah, sure. Actually, it's not weakness. It's seasonality. And it's just the timing of deliverables and usage around those contracts. As I mentioned, we get these annual commit contracts, but some of them are recognized ratably and some of them are recognized based on usage, depending on the nature of the product that the customer purchased. And so in this case, you see a lot of usage in the harvesting or pre-harvesting periods for operational efficiency. And then you see that drop off as you get later into the harvesting cycles. And so that's just seasonality that we would expect year to year. Actually, we're pleased with the stability that we're seeing in the agricultural business. And I think that's largely driven by the shift that we've made over the last couple of years to move out of more of the marketing arms of the agriculture sector and really be embedded into the operations of our customers. So I'm actually very pleased with the progress we're seeing in the ag sector and see that as a potential growth vector for us in the future.

Executive (Management): If I just have one more thing, it's that we have figured out how to align our business model with theirs, and now we believe we're in a stronger position to help serve that market. But you're right that the overall segment has been having challenges.

Chris Quilty (Quilty Space): Thanks, guys. Following on the earlier talk of the pipeline, you know, $170 million deals, and the fact that you're doing the factory expansion in Berlin, what do you expect you'll need in terms of production rate? And is that, you know, Where are you at today and where do you expect to scale in the next year? And is that sufficient capacity with those two facilities should the opportunity show?

Executive (Management): Yeah, well, obviously we are building those facilities, both our expansion here and what we're doing in Berlin, exactly to build towards the demand that we expect to see. Yeah, we're obviously trying to do that. As I think we said at the time of announcing the building manufacturing site, that will roughly double our capacity to build the Pelican satellites. And excited to say we're making some really good headway there, found the place, and now our next year we'll be going into operations there. So excited by that. But, yeah, we're obviously trying to match that demand. We are seeing very strong demand for deals that include building new satellites and for deals that involve leveraging existing satellites, both. Remember, there's a mix between those two, and that affects whether or not we have to launch new satellites. But on both sides, we're seeing a lot of opportunity.